Monday, January 30, 2017

The Wrong Question

A relatively famous person in the gun owner rights movement recently criticized this outcome and asked how we can stop illegal straw purchasers if we allow such releases.

In other words, he supports the Brady Act and "background checks," and believes  gun owner control edicts actually work. And has no problem with the fedgov assuming powers nowhere delegated to it in the Constitution. And doesn't really believe in "shall not be infringed."

I guess I really am in the extreme. Were it up to me, guns would be freely traded, and anyone who couldn't be trusted with one would have the appropriate custodial arrangement.




4 comments:

Paul Bonneau said...

Yes, it never ceases to amaze me how many gun owners buy the premises of gun control, or make a fetish of obeying unconstitutional and immoral law.

Fight islam Now said...

And when you got out of jail your guns would be handed back to you at the gate (unless you were convicted of a violent crime in which case you'd have been hung quickly and not leaving)

Fight islam Now

Anonymous said...

It's disgusting with all the evidence we have that gun control does nothing to stop those with criminal intent but instead only serves to discourage and deny guns to the innocent that there are gun owners and others that support it.

Bluesgal said...

The loss of critical thinking.... in most debates/discussion/arguments logic has been replaced with emotion.

For example and to name a few of the favorites to insert:
It's for the Children (Applicable to everything and anything)
It makes me feel safer (See TSA and bag searches at NFL, NBA and MLB games to name a few).
It's common sense (as in you're an idiot if you do not agree with me)

They "logically" justify based upon emotion...